![]() ![]() ![]() Here is a good chart that tells the whole story in detail. However, the modern Hebrew alphabet is not derived directly from Phoenician, it is in fact a modern form of the Aramaic alphabet which, in its own turn, was derived from Phoenician and had a long evolution history of cursive pen-and-ink forms which obscures the connection of the Modern Hebrew and Ancient Phoenician scripts. The point is, the Greek monumental capitals are derived directly from the Phoenician alphabet in its monumental form and the Latin capitals directly from the Greek ones, so their letters look similar and you can trace the way they evolved. You need more detailed charts of the letter evolution. Apologies in advance for any imprecision of the question-I'm just a "civilian", not a language scholar. Seems like a lot of sort of flowing lines, like Arabic (but maybe Arabic comes from it?) Not the straight lines of Greek, etc.ĭespite all that, some of the names are pretty suggestive of similarities (e.g. Not like softened or distorted versions of common letters. But the Hebrew one has a couple of arrows coming out of a branch, or like two-thirds of a psi. I mean, an oval or a circle or even a box or diamond all look o-like. And look how massively different the "O" is. Maybe only the H is similar (and that's versus lower case h and making it grow a bit on the left). But the Hebrew ones look very, very different. I can still see similarities (maybe with rotations or flipping of characters) versus our current Latin system. Why do the Hebrew characters look so different? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |